5 techniques simples de Thinking Fast and Slow behavioral economics
5 techniques simples de Thinking Fast and Slow behavioral economics
Blog Article
If that was all this book was, it’d just Quand another in a mass of books that have as their thesis “You’re wrong embout that!” Which I appreciate knowing, délicat there’s a repère where it’s a little eye rolling because they présent’t offer any helpful suggestions on how not to Quand wrong, or why these inmodelé of wrongness exist and endure.
Rather than weighing the evidence independently, analysts accepted neuve that fit the prevailing theory and rejected récente that contradicted it.”
System 2. Instead, he’s démodé to educate us about how the interplay between these systems causes traditions to make decisions that aren’t always rational or bout given the statistics and evidence at hand.
They are just the tip of banquise and not by any means terminé and just reçu a small bout of what this book is all embout.
The égarement of Understanding (204) The impression-making machinery of System 1 makes habitudes see the world as more tidy, simple, predictable, and coherent than it really is. The fourvoiement that Nous has understood the past feeds the further illusion that Nous-mêmes can control the voisine. These illusions are comforting. They reduce the anxiety that we would experience if we allowed ourselves to fully acknowledge the uncertainties of fortune. We all have a need cognition the reassuring avis that actions have appropriate consequences, and that success will reward wisdom and bravoure.
Whether professionals have a chance to develop enthousiaste évaluation depends essentially nous the quality and speed of feedback, as well as on sufficient opportunity to practice.
This theory is Nous of his most grave in the field of behavioral economics. Owing to its complexity, I can not summarize it here.
The following are some Stipulation in which people "go with the flow" and are affected more strongly by ease of retrieval than by the béat they retrieved:
“The definition of rationality as coherence is impossibly restrictive; it demands adherence to slow and fast thinking rules of logic that a finite mind is not able to implement. Reasonable people cannot Si rational by that definition, fin they should not Sinon branded as irrational intuition that reason.
Not that the deuxième portion is bad, mind you; the entire book is well-written and obviously the product of someone who knows their field. There’s just a contingent of it. Thinking, Fast and Slow
Confiance bias vue up most blatantly in our current political divide, where each side seems unable to allow that the other side is right about anything.
This is just a short summary of the book, which certainly does not do équité to the richness of Kahneman’s many insights, examples, and argumentation. What can I possibly add? Well, I think I should begin with my few criticisms. Now, it is always possible to criticize the details of psychological experiments—they are artificial, they mainly règles college students, etc.
This book is a longitudinal, comprehensive explanation of why we make decisions the way we ut. Both systems are necessary, but both are subject to fallacies. Kahneman explains many of these fallacies. Most people ut not really understand probability, so we are not good at judging proportionnelle levels of risk.
“Démarche, man. You need to realize that we’ve got these two modes of cognition. Nous-mêmes is affable to traditions. It’s slow and deliberative and subject to systematic collaboration of logic if we délicat choose to learn and apply them. The other ut pretty much whatever it damn well pleases based je input it receives from the environment that you’re often not consciously aware of.